THE GOSPEL MESSAGE

    Volume 46   Number 7                                                              March 2004
Editor and Publisher - Thomas W. Woody

WANTED:
God's BFOQs for Evangelists
Barry Poyner


The world looks at appearances, but God looks upon the heart (1 Samuel 16:7). The world would not choose David, but God would. The world rejected Jesus of Nazareth, but God exalted him (Acts 4:10-12; Philippians 2:9). A worldly point of view might adopt the following bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQs) for an ideal evangelist:

The successful candidate for our ministerial (pulpit) position will be between ages 30-50, married with school-age children, and educated in a Christian college. Picture required.


In the business world, employers set BFOQs in order to establish job criteria. These criteria, if legitimate and non-discriminatory, are used to deny employment, and trained interviewers carefully avoid asking non-BFOQ questions. Of course, churches may set guidelines that reflect doctrinal understandings. The fictional ad above is unfortunately the norm in many churches of Christ. Not even the secular world would treat people this unfairly! To deny a man the opportunity to preach on the basis of marriage, age, children, or looks borders on the criminal! Let's speak as the oracles of God (1 Peter 4:11). Let's be about the Father's business (Luke 2:49).


For some, there is the belief that having one full-time preacher will attract people. Realistically, using the worldly model, small churches cannot afford to hire the best, and therefore if they hire anyone at all, they are at risk of hiring men with character or personality flaws and limited abilities-otherwise these men would have climbed the ladder of success to the largest congregations! Hence, a small congregation often hires a man that will be largely unsuccessful in achieving what they hired him for in the first place! What they get is trouble and division.


Consider Nashville, Tennessee. A body of believers was established in 1828. The elders and many of the members took turns preaching. They started nearby congregations and appointed two evangelists, Tolbert Fanning and Absalom Adams, to spread the word. David Lipscomb noted, however, when they employed a full-time preacher, the spirit of evangelism weakened, and their ranks were decimated by the apostasy of a one man pastor, Jesse Ferguson. Ten years later when Philip Fall worked with them, "not a member would pray at the communion service in public worship" (James R. Wilburn, The Hazard of the Die: Tolbert Fanning and the Restoration Movement, p. 155).


The expectation of one man exclusively filling the pulpit was not readily accepted by the brotherhood and cannot be scripturally defended as God's role for an evangelist. Consider the words of J.W. Shepherd in The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration, a classic work still being reprinted by the Gospel Advocate Company:

"From the letters to Timothy and Titus it appears that the general work of an evangelist was to preach the Gospel in other fields than the congregation in which he held his membership, establish churches and take care of them, appoint elders and deacons when such work was appropriate, and to labor for such congregations as needed assistance, whether with or without an eldership." (p. 48).


At our congregation in Kirksville, we have many preachers-men who read from the Scriptures and teach. We have even more ministers-people serving God and man through individualized ministries. Indeed, we attempt to qualify the called. However, no one presently has been appointed to do the work of an evangelist.


Elders need to give earnest heed to the preparation and appointment of evangelists. Preparation, including both formal and informal education and training, is a legitimate concern. Sadly, elders in many areas of the country take a lax approach to evangelistic preparation. Timothy was urged to give diligence, to study (2 Timothy 2:15). First Century leaders were aided by inspiration to give the early church a miraculous start; God expects 21st Century men to use perspiration! Elders cannot expect and should not rely on institutions to train evangelists. Higher education can help prepare a man, but only elders can determine readiness and appoint.


In my own preparation as an evangelist, I never had an elder to sit down with me and suggest courses to take in school or to provide guidance. My interest in preaching was seen simply as my own vocational choice. The unstated assumption was that if I was good enough, likeable, and scriptural that I could land a job. And here lies the problem:
the biblical role of an evangelist has been removed from an appointment by caring elders who partner with a brother and relegated to a hiring by committees who negotiate a job description with a man. In my experience, I have seen full-time preachers abused and made the scapegoat for congregational problems. I am persuaded that churches and elders will one day give an account for this profane abuse! The very fact that God has been so specific about qualifications for elders and deacons illustrates that God expects these men to be the leaders, principal feeders, and care-givers of his flocks.


When it comes to the work of an evangelist, some hold forth questionable criteria for his selection, preparation, and duties. God expects an evangelist to convince, rebuke, and exhort (2 Timothy 4:1-5). There is not a word said about marriage, age, children, looks, or exact manner of training. God expects a man to be prepared to preach to one or many. He should study and learn from other evangelists and be an example of the believers (1 Timothy 4:12-16; 2 Timothy 2:2). God expects an evangelist to work well with people, to be patient. God expects evangelists to be appointed by elders and respectful of their guidance. Unlike a worldly view, God's design is to put the most talented on the front-lines of battle, providing small churches evangelistic support until the time they can develop elders and deacons. We better mind God's BFOQs.


Another way that you can dialogue with me about these thoughts is to visit our Discussion Board at:

www.kirksville.veren.com



~ 1904 S. Cottage Grove Pl., Kirksville, MO 63501-3922



Back to March 2004 - Vol. 46 #7 Page