Volume 46 Number 1 September 2003
From a study of 1 Corinthians 14:26-40, several things become apparent:
Clearly, Paul was pleased with a plurality of participants in the
assembly. Despite the fact that such an arrangement came with potential
hazards, he wrote nothing to discourage the Corinthians from their mutual
edification. Instead, he communicated a few helpful guidelines, thereby
affirming its practice. An assembly in which many had the opportunity to
bring a song, offer a teaching, or exercise a miraculous gift was, in the
eyes of the apostle, a good thing.
Sounds strikingly dissimilar to the practice of many of today's
churches, doesn't it? What are we to make of it? Were Paul's
instructions to the brethren at Corinth unusual? No. Paul stated four
times in his letter to the Corinthians that what he taught them he taught
everywhere else (1 Corinthians 4:17; 11:16; 14:33; 16:1). Perhaps, Corinth
was an isolated case, then, and stood out among the New Testament
churches because of her mutual ministry meetings? From a careful
examination of the New Testament Scriptures, we can offer a definitive
"no" on that question, as well. What was true at Corinth, was true
elsewhere.
"Now in the church that was at Antioch there were certain prophets and
teachers..." (Acts 13:1). As at Corinth, God had inspired more than one
individual. And, as at Corinth, along with the prophets, there were
multiple uninspired "teachers" (1 Corinthians 14:26). Even when an apostle was
present there, many members shared the role of edifying, as evidenced by
Acts 15:35: "Paul and Barnabas also remained in Antioch, teaching and
preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also." It was not
Paul's-nor the church's-prerogative to put the "best man" in the pulpit,
if even there was a pulpit. There were many with the ability, so many
participated.
The same practice existed at Ephesus. Though Timothy, the evangelist (2
Timothy 4:5), was there, he shared the work of public edification. Paul
began his first epistle to Timothy by stating, "remain in Ephesus that
you may charge some that they teach no other doctrine" (1 Timothy 1:3). His
job wasn't to do all the teaching, but to make sure that others' teaching
was sound. The same idea is emphasized in Paul's second epistle to this
young evangelist: "And the things that you have heard from me among many
witnesses, commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others
also" (2 Timothy 2:2). Was Timothy the resident exhorter? Did the
brethren come every Sunday morning to hear him? The Scripture doesn't
lead us to that conclusion.
Finally, there is the cumulative message of various other passages. In
Romans 15:14, Paul declared, "Now I myself am confident concerning you,
my brethren, that you also are full of goodness, filled with all
knowledge, able also to admonish one another."
To the Ephesians, he wrote, "speaking the truth in love, may grow up in
all things into Him who is the head --Christ-- from whom the whole body,
joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the
effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of
the body for the edifying of itself in love." (Ephesians 4:15,16).
Paul also said that members possess the gifts of teaching and exhorting
(Romans 12:7-8). According to Peter, those who possess gifts are to use
them: "As each one has received a gift, minister it to one another, as
good stewards of the manifold grace of God. If anyone speaks, let him
speak as the oracles of God. If anyone ministers, let him do it as with
the ability which God supplies, that in all things God may be glorified
through Jesus Christ, to whom belong the glory and the dominion forever
and ever. Amen." (1 Peter 4:10,11). The assembly is one place to do just
that (Hebrews 10:25).
With all of the above in mind, can there be any doubt that the apostolic
church permitted and encouraged multiple persons to be involved in its
assemblies?